Skip to main content

Harnessing Public Food Procurement for Sustainable Rural Livelihoods in South Africa through the National School Nutrition Programme: A Qualitative Assessment of Contributions and Challenges

  • Published on May 19, 2022

This paper examines how public food procurements contributes to sustainable rural livelihoods through local sourcing of school food, what has become known as ‘home-grown’ school feeding. Specifically, it draws on in-depth interviews to explore the contributions and challenges of using local farmers as suppliers for South Africa’s National School Nutrition Programme (NSNP) using the case of the Eastern Cape Province, the country’s poorest province. The study found that participating schools in rural areas benefit from local sourcing by way of using fresh vegetables in preparing meals thanks to the utilisation of a decentralised catering model in the Eastern Cape Province. Consequently, there is evidence of farmers participating in NSNP food market earning additional income and growing more vegetables on more land in some cases. However, even though the Eastern Cape Province uses a decentralised procurement model, it has no clear-cut programme to optimise the benefits of local sourcing for NSNP. It only ‘encourages’ schools to buy vegetables grown locally. This calls for pragmatism on the side of government to, through creative procurement and initiatives such as the Agri-Parks, use NSNP as a tool for making the South African food system more inclusive, drive down rural poverty and realise sustainable rural development.

The study was conducted in July 2017 in the Mbhashe Local Municipality of the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Mbhashe is predominantly rural, with agriculture being the major economic activity. About 36,377 households live-off agriculture. The areas of the municipality are mostly under communal land tenure, and agriculture in the Mbhashe area is mostly smallholder crop farming and open grazed livestock. There are various concentration points on agricultural development such as: maize production, vegetable production, livestock improvement, poultry and citrus fruit. One major challenge that farming households face is the marketing of their produce. Poverty is prevalent, about 63% in rural areas compared to 22% in urban areas. As a result, there is high dependence on social grants as a form of income.

You might also be Interested in