Of interest to policy makers and industry associations tasked with setting mandatory or voluntary ecodesign standards for textiles and furniture. Also of high utility for designers and brands looking for inspiration in how to design textiles and furniture for a high level of material efficiency and circularity.

Provides a first set of ecodesign criteria for textiles and furniture, as input to the EU Ecodesign Directive. Also of relevance in other regions.

Implemented in

  • Europe and Central Asia

Sectors of activity
Consumer Goods, Waste, incl. Chemicals, Public Procurement

Type of initiative
Policy Frameworks & Tools

Type of lead actor
Government / public sector

Start date

End date

Shared by

David Watson

Senior Consultant


Send an email


The transition to a more circular economy is an essential contribution to develop a sustainable, low carbon, resource efficient and competitive economy in the EU. In a circular economy the value of products, materials and resources is maintained in the economy for as long as possible, and the generation of waste is minimised.

Mandatory or voluntary ecodesign criteria can be used to set minimum standards for circualrity and material efficiency. However, they have so far mostly been used in the context of improving energy efficiency and not material efficiency.

The objectives of this initiative was to develop a first set of ecodesign criteria for textiles and furniture with a focus on circularity, to demonstrate how ecodesign criteria can be utilised for non-energy using products. The approach is considered as a useful input to development of material efficiency ecodesign criteria in the European Commission.


As collected through the One Planet Reporting

No activities have yet been reported under this initiative

Impact and Results

The result is a set of 15 ecodesign criteria for textile products gathered under four themes: durability, reparability, recyclability, recycled content.

The criteria include those based on minimum thresholds - for example a minimum number of times a zip can be zipped before it fails, or a minimum content of recycled material - and on mandatory provision of information - i.e. the need to provide a full bill of materials, to announce recycled content and to provide care and maintenance guidance that increase durability.

For threshold-based criteria, the value of thresholds have not yet been set. This would need to be the subject of intensive dialogue between policy makers and industry that strike a balance between ambition for circularity improvements and the costs of meeting the minimum standards. Rolling thresholds that become more strict over time are envisaged. In some cases thresholds will need to differ between different fibre types.

Testing and documentation standards exist for most of the proposed requirements but would need to be developed for a criterion on ease of disassembly.

If the criteria were adopted at EU level an upper limit for the greenhouse gas savings of the set of proposed requirements was estimated at 85 million tonnes CO2-equiv. per year. The achieved benefits will depend on levels set for threshold requirements and responses to infromation declarations.

A “light application” of the criteria development methodology was applied to furniture that included 7 criteria.

Next steps and how to get involved

The proposed Ecodesign criteria for furniture and textiles now need to be taken forward by government and industry.

If you are a policy maker or representative of an industry association in textiles or furniture sector then read the Policy Brief to gain inspiration for potential criteria - and the main report of you need more information. Engage other stakeholders in dialogue on how these criteria can be implemented, and on the setting of thresholds under each of the 14 criteria for textiles and the 7 criteria for furniture.

Contact David Watson at PlanMiljø dw@planmiljoe.dk for more information